A Real Republican Revolution

The last election is evidence that there needs to be a serious purge of the RINOs who infest the Republican Party. I mean a Stalin-like purge, not with the violence but with the same intensity of Stalin’s purges.

The RINOs have been an influence in the Republican Party since the 50’s, though they seem to have fully taken control in the past 20-30 years.

RINOs can also be called Country Club Republicans and they look down on those who hold to true Conservative principles and pretty much consider us the unwashed masses.

My hatred of these pukes has been brewing for years and has started to boil over after seeing the way some of the RINOs have treated true Conservative (so far) Sarah Palin. Some of them have the nerve to blame her for arch-RINO McCain loosing the election.

Many Republicans (such as me, for which I’ve sincerely repented) ONLY voted for McCain because Palin was on the ticket.

What needs to be done is to purge any “Republican” politician who doesn’t adhere to the main planks of the Republican Party Platform.

Obviously any “Republican” who supports a Demoncratic candidate, except for the most extreme circumstances should be purged.

I think most true Republicans would see the main points as being; a strong national defense, smaller government, pro-gun rights, anti-abortion, traditional families (i.e., no homosexual “marriage”), and rejecting the global “warming” nonsense.

By “purge” I mean, any “Republican” who goes against any two and definitely any three of the above positions would receive no support or endorsement from the official Republican Party and no official Republican Party representative will refer to the individual as a “Republican”.

Perhaps the Platform can be updated to clearly state the above positions, or if the RINOs manage to remove some of those main issues, true Conservatives can break away from the Party and form another party.

Whatever we do, this has to change. Otherwise we’ll either get more Obamas, or RINOs who would be no different from an Obama or a Clinton or Kennedy.

Just a thought.

Robot

WiRogue@aim.com

831-869-9932

The Attempted Queering of Black America

Proposition 8, which confirmed that true marriage is between one MAN and one WOMAN passed with nearly 70 percent of the black vote. The sodomite lobby (which doesn’t just include the perverts who engage in the practice) have expressed surprise and outrage that most blacks voted against them. For some reason, the degenerates think that because blacks were once a persecuted minority (yes, I did say ONCE, i.e. in the PAST a persecuted minority) we should also support their unnatural practices.

True, there are some blacks who’ve been hanging around white liberals too long and have been brainwashed into feeling that sodomites are just another minority. One of my former best friends is one of them (I don’t mean as in queer (but I wonder sometimes), I mean he’s been brainwashed into accepting buggery as normal) others however, will nod in agreement to their liberal friends but are thinking to themselves “of course homosexuality is unnatural”. It was these blacks who while voting for the most pro-homosexual presidential candidate in history, also voted to uphold the ban homosexual “marriage”.

All of the pro-homosexual propaganda, including Hollywood putting a homosexual into nearly ever TV sitcom still hasn’t convinced the majority of Blacks that homosexuality is “normal”.

Unlike Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and the NAACP (Negroes Are Actually Colored People) I don’t pretend to speak for all Black Americans, however few things infuriate me more than to have the degenerates of the Queer lobby try to justify their perverted activity by comparing themselves to blacks.

A basic knowledge anatomy shows that homosexuality isn’t normal, therefore there is no such thing as homosexual “marriage”.

No ifs, ands, or butts about it

I do have a prediction for the next years. The sodomite lobby and Hollywood will direct more pro-homosexual propaganda toward Blacks. There will be an increase of black homosexual characters on television and in movies and it won’t be the usual hairdressers and fashion store owners. It will be tough black guys who just happen to bugger other men when they aren’t out kicking butt.

Homosexuality is also a hard sell in the Asian and Latino community, so there will also be more of them playing butt-rangers.

If This Country ever fully accepts homosexuality as “normal” that will be the end of it.

Robot
wirogue@aim.com
831-869-9932

Fight Crime, Shoot Back (Better Yet, Shoot First)

I know this will never happen in our politically correct (i.e. cowardly) society, but what if crime-ridden cities and counties offered a bounty for any convicted criminal killed or captured DURING THE COMMISION OF A CRIME.

In other words, if a homeowner shoots a criminal during a burglary or home invasion or if a business owner or one of his employees shoots a criminal while they are attempting a robbery, either the city or county would pay the individual a few thousand dollars. I think if the convicted thug is killed, the individual should be paid roughly ten percent of what it would have cost to run the thug through the legal system.

Along with offering a bounty for the thugs, either law enforcement or better yet, private instructors could provide firearms training for law-abiding business owners and other private citizens (After a background check).

There are several obvious speed bumps to this plan. One: the thug (if the defending person’s shooting ability isn’t what it should be) or his relatives may try to sue the defender, and Two: pro-crime and/or other “peace” groups will try to stop the program

There are two ways to deal these fools. The city or county (or better yet, private citizens) could host a website where the home and work address of the person(s) suing the defenders are listed. The law-abiding public could contact the people supporting the criminal and tell them why they are fed up with the mindless thugs who are practically running their city.

Left-wing pro-crime organizations could be countered by forming organizations of honest citizens and crime victims who could speak and protest in opposition to them.

Granted, as I wrote in the beginning, this will never happen. Obviously my plan wouldn’t completely stop violent crime, but it would make living in a crime-ridden city as dangerous for the criminals as it is for the good people.

Robot
Wirogue@aim.com
831-869-9932

Vote Yes on Propositions 4 and 8: It's Only Common Sense

There may be a few grey issues on the California ballot. Proposition 4 and Proposition 8 are two that definitely are not.

Proposition 4, would require parental notification before an UNDERAGE female can murder her unborn child. To any somewhat, moral thinking person, that would be a no-brainer, but of course we are talking about liberals, who generally have no actual moral issues and basically have a “if it feels good, do it and if you screw up, the government will bail you out” mentality .

The pro-infanticide crowd claims that abused girls would have a problem going to their parents if the abuser is a family member. Of course, that’s probably the lamest argument against the proposition they could come up with.

Were the abuser a father or stepfather, he would be more prone to rush the victimized girl to an abortion mill.

A “no” vote on Prop. 4 would be sort of an old pervert’s protection act. An adult pervert who knocks up a 15-year-old would be able to take her for an abortion with no questions asked.

Surely, a Planned Parenthood (infanticide) abortion clinic would ask no questions, nor would they report it to the police.

The real problem the Left and especially Planned (infanticide) Parenthood has with Prop. 4 are they fear that somewhere, someplace a young girl will actually keep her baby. After all, Planned Parenthood (Infanticide) really makes a killing out of doing abortions and if Prop. 4 passed, it would cut into their profits, and undermine their social agenda. Also, I think abortion is a form of pagan sacrifice for some of those on the Left.

Proposition 8 is even more of a no-brainer, again, unless you’re a liberal. Prop. 8 would define marriage in the California Constitution as between one Man and one FEMALE. Duh. A basic knowledge of anatomy will tell any thinking person that homosexuality and therefore, allowing them to “marry” is unnatural. Sodomites can already have domestic “partnerships”. Homosexuals know what they do is unnatural. They want to “marry” so that they can convince themselves that what they engage in is normal.

Proposition 8 is not “discrimination. If I read the proposition correctly, I didn’t see anyplace where it called for separate water facets and restrooms for homosexuals and normal people (though given some of the diseases many of them are prone to get, that may not be a bad idea), nor did I read anywhere in the proposition where homosexuals were to be denied the right to vote or own property.

A yes vote on Proposition 8 is just common sense.

Robot

www.InsideTheCompound.com

elishewitz@gmail.com

831-869-9932

McCain Bad, B. Hussein Obama Worse (but just barely)

I don't have the words to describe how much I hate Mccain. He's arguably, one of the 5 biggest RINO's (Republican In Name Only) in the Republican Party. I've talked to some of the most Anti-American, Anti-Christian, degenerate liberal pukes, and they like McCain, and why shouldn't they? He's one of them. The idiot even said he would have Al Gore on his staff to deal with the (mythical) issue of “global warming” and he supports amnesty for illegal aliens.

However, not only do I hate B.O., I fear what he will do to This Country. I was seriously considering voting for Chuck Baldwin, the Constitution Party candidate, but after seeing B.O. is worshiped by the mindless masses on the Left, I'm considering voting for McCain.

I know I'll regret it if he gets into office. Should he get in, he'll do what he always does, run across the aisle to work with the enemy. Yes, Democrats in general and Liberals in particular, ARE THE ENEMY. To save This Country, we (True Republicans and other Conservatives) should not be working or compromising with the left. We need to defeat them.

That won’t happen with a RINO, sellout like McCain, but for the time being it’s all we have.

Personally, I’d prefer we split up the Country between the Right and the Wrong (left).

Robot

www.InsideTheCompound.com

elishewitz@gmail.com

831-869-9932

The Left Finally admits it, they’re Racist

Of course, that isn’t news to any thinking person. The Left has always operated on the belief that Blacks and other minorities can’t succeed in life without their liberal, White massa’s to he’p them with government programs. Race-baiting poverty-pimps like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and other assorted left-wing activists help them promote the myth.

Now after the failure of enviro-Marxist Al Gore and light-Marxist John Kerry to beat George (RINO) Bush Jr. in the last two presidential elections, the left is now running the Mocha-Marxist, B. Hussein Obama (B.O.) as presidential nominee.

Surprisingly, they even appear to be doing so with a straight face so far. B.O. is a one-term U.S. Senator who has no qualifications other than hating America , being close friends with a 60’s era terrorist, (Ayers) having had for twenty years a goofy, racist, anti-American head case as a pastor, and being a community “organizer”. By the way, the community group he “organized” with is a group called ACORN which is well known for voter fraud.

The Left claims people may not vote for B.O. because he’s *gasp* a Negro. (The horror, the horror.)

Even if B.O. was a blond-haired, blue-eyed Aryan-looking man or even a hot-looking blond woman with Ann Coulter’s looks, no Republican (with the possible exception of some RINOs (Republican In Name Only)) would vote for him.

So, the only logical conclusion one came come to is the Left fears their own racist, white comrades will refuse to vote for the black guy. Sure, they feel it’s acceptable to scare blacks and other minorities into voting for them and their policies, but to actually have one as PRESIDENT? Lenin forbid! (Perhaps they also fear there’ll be fried chicken and grape soda at the inaugural ball)

Why wouldn’t any liberal feel comfortable voting for McCain? After all, he’s practically one of them. Other their stand on the war in Iraq (which will probably be all but won by the time the next president takes office) there’s not much difference between them.

Of course now that McCain needs the support of the Conservatives he’s trashed his whole time in office, he’s now posing as a real Republican. He even chose Sarah Palin (Who’s more qualified than either McCain or B.O.) as his running mate and Conservative “beard” to fool some Conservatives into voting for him.

Of course Palin will only be VICE-president and her main job after waking will be to check to see if McCain has died overnight.

The left knows this (even if many Conservatives don’t) and some will have no problem voting for McCain rather than the unknown black guy.

So basically, the Left fears the racists among their own comrades.


The race card has been played, and it’s a Spade.

Robot

robot@mbay.net

www.InsideTheCompound.com

831-869-9932

The Common Sense Definition of the Second Amendment Reigns Supreme (Finally)

The recent decision by the majority of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices only emphasizes the obvious, that the 2^nd Amendment refers to an INDIVIDUAL right to KEEP and BEAR arms.

The fact that four of the justices refuses to see that only goes to show that just because a person wears a black robe and has a law degree does not necessarily mean they’re intelligent or even have much common sense. Perhaps they, like many elected officials and public “servants” fear that if they go too far they may find themselves on the wrong end of a citizen’s firearm. A more foreboding thought is that they INTEND to eventually go too far, and impose laws and regulations that no free person would tolerate.

One has to be simple-minded and cowardly to deny that the Founders recognized the God-given right for INDIVIDUALS to be armed and that the right did not refer to a standing army. Standing armies, either military or civilian (as in civilian police agencies) are organizations that would be used to enforce the directives of a tyrannical government, and the type of organizations an armed citizenry would have to defend against.

In all the other places in the Bill of Rights where rights of the “people” are mentioned, it refers to an individual right. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, etc. was not referring to a collective right, nor was the right to free speech referring to the right of the government to put out their propaganda unopposed.

The Los Angeles Times published an editorial shortly after the ruling, claiming the Supreme Court “…opted for the interpretation less suited to a 20^th century America bedeviled by “gun” crime”. Apparently in some crime-ridden areas of this Country firearms are victimizing people without the need of a criminal hand to guide them.

The editorial also claims the court went against the “majority” and “traditional” (i.e. the wrong) interpretation of the amendment. The interpretation they’re referring to is only held by anti-gun, anti-self defense extremists.

Of course, the anti-gun eunuchs are claiming that because the law-abiding people of Washington D.C. (all two dozen of them) will now be allowed to arm and defend themselves gun violence will increase. Perhaps, but the only increase will be the violence done to criminals by their intended victims, which most people, other than liberals will see as a good thing.

It’s interesting to note that while the anti-gun zealots want to disarm law-abiding citizens, they always snivel and whine to no end when someone suggests we should actually punish criminals more severely.

But as Forrest Gump said, “Stupid is as stupid does”.

Robot

831-869-9932

California: The Sodomite State

In a move that shows their utter contempt for the people of California, Common sense and nature (God) Itself, the California Supreme Court ruled that not allowing same sex couples to “marry” was “unconstitutional.

I’ve said it before and will doubtlessly say it again, a basic knowledge of anatomy will show the average person, queer or not that homosexuality is unnatural and perverted. Nope, as far as human sexual relations go tab “A” doesn’t (or shouldn’t) go into slot “A”.

I’ve often said that if homos are allowed to “marry” there will be no reason to keep people from engaging in polygamy or “marrying” animals. Of course the queer lobby scoffs at the obvious conclusion. That is, MOST of the sodomite lobby scoffs at that. There is one notable exception. Frank Kameny, a hero of the queer community wrote to a pro-family group that a person should be able to knock boots (hooves, paws whatever) with an animal if that’s what gets them off. http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=66060

Kameny was instrumental in getting the American Psychiatric Association into reclassifying homosexuality as “normal”.

In spite of the victory given to the degenerates by the California Supreme Court, there is a glimmer of hope for the State. Yesterday the California Marriage Protection Act qualified for the November ballot. The initiative needed just under 700,000 signatures and it received over a million. This is a proposed California Constitution Amendment that will state the obvious, that MARRIAGE is between a MAN and a WOMAN.

Robot

831-869-9932

The Democratic Party’s True Color is Red

I mean Red as in Communism, Marxism and Leninism. I’ve always said there’s little to no difference between most liberals and Communists. The only difference being what they will admit to believing in public.

A Liberal for example, wants all the same things that a communist would want, but they will deny to the death that they are in fact, Communist. A communist on the other hand will freely admit what he is and will tell you he wants the government to collect and manage your private property.

Rep. Maxine Waters, Democrat from California showed her true colors during a House panel “investigating” the high cost of gasoline.

Waters told the panel and several oil company executives that if gas prices aren’t lowered the government should take over and run the companies. One of the executives pointed out that Venezuela, under Dictator Hugo Chavez (Who, along with Fidel Castro is a hero of the left) did the same thing. I’m sure Waters had Chavez and Fidel Castro in mind when she dusted off this old, faded idea.

While that is the feeling of most democrats and liberals, it’s surprising to actually hear one admit that in public. However, Waters is not one of the sharpest knives in the drawer.

It should also be remembered that Waters is a member of the House Progressive Caucus. The Progressive Caucus consists of the most Marxist-minded of the House Democrats.

(See the New American article on the Progressive Caucus: http://www.thenewamerican.com/node/905)

For years I’ve been listening to Liberals praising all things Communist. Their plans for society consist of having the government not only providing every needs of U.S. citizens, were they to have they way, we would also be providing handouts to the rest of the world. That is, more than we already are.

As I mentioned before one of the Left’s primary heroes is Fidel Castro. About a year ago or so I attended a discussion about Castro’s Cuba put on by the Pastors For “Peace’ and the local “peace” activist. During the lecture (rant) one of the speakers said there are no rich in Cuba. He ecstatically proclaimed “In Cuba you’re not allowed to be rich”

At a more recent event put on by the same Reds, the praise of Castro continued. Among the group was a businessman who has legal and illegal dealings with Cuba. He had the audacity to tell this group that most of the recent (presumably positive) reforms in Cuba would not have happened had Castro still been in power rather than his brother Raul.

This of course enraged some of the attendees of this Castro worship service. (Ironically, this meeting was held in a Church fellowship room.) There were outbursts from several of the worshippers who opposed hearing their god so “slighted”.

One woman claimed Cuba is the example the U.S. should follow in order for us to deal with global “warming” and water “shortages’, etc.

Were these Marxist fools simply confined to Carmel, Santa Cruz and Berkeley, the situation wouldn’t be so grave. Unfortunately, we have at least two of the same ilk running for president, and a third while though he calls himself a Republican, will not be much different.

We’re screwed.

Robot

831-869-9932

'Rather a Bullet in the Brain, than a Vote for McCain

We Are So, So Screwed

This upcoming presidential election, barring some miracle is a battle of the liberals. On the Red side, the choice will either be an evil Marxist broom jockey AKA: HilLIARy (Shriek) Clinton or Obama Hussein, the Mocha Marxist. On the Republican side the choice is RINO, Pink Elephant John McCain and whichever liberal chosen to run with him.

No one with a brain and who doesn’t use drugs, or is dependent on government handouts needs to be told what a disaster for this Country Shriek and the Mocha Marxist will be, but some people who don’t follow the political scene may be fooled into voting for the Pink Elephant.

Other than his support for the continuing Iraq War, nothing much separates him from The Shriek or the Mocha Marxist.

As pointed out by Ann Coulter and others, mccain: supports illegal aliens, opposes a Constitutional Amendment banning queer “marriage”, called U.S. Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito “too conservative” wants to shut down Guantanamo supports taxpayer funding of embryonic stem cell use, believes in the myth of “global warming” and not only opposed the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, but considered being a running mate to COMRADE JOHN KERRY!

If that weren’t enough, he opposes overturning Roe v. Wade (frankly, while I’m generally opposed to abortion, it isn’t one of my major social issues because the vast majority of the people who have them are liberals, and anything that keeps them from overpopulating can have its uses) he bashed Pat Robertson and the Reverend Jerry Falwell and “agents of intolerance” and part of the “forces of evil”.

Lastly, mccain has been endorsed by California RINO Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger-Kennedy. That alone should be enough for anyone true Republican to not support him.

In general, the Country Club, Pink Elephant RINOs, have nothing but contempt for Conservative Republicans and their push to do away with them began in the 50’s with groups like the Ripon Society and continued (successfully) in the 90’s with the “Mainstream’ (liberal) Republican group, which took over many of California’s County Republican central Committees.

You may notice how some of their ilk are joining online forums and attempting to herd the people who aren’t fooled by mccain into voting for him using insults, claiming refusing to support the clown “aren’t true Republicans” and attempting to use the specter of a HilLIARy presidency to scare us into voting for into voting for the RINO, Steve Martin look-alike.

While I would never even jokingly consider voting for Shriek or the Mocha Marxist, I sure as HELL won’t be voting for mccain.

The worse thing about a mccain presidency is that if he wins, the principles of the Republican Party will be forever abandoned and anyone even slightly more Conservative than mccain will be labeled as an “extremist”.

Unfortunately, this Country appears to be finished and sadly, there’s no other country to run to.

Robot

831-869-9932

Gun Checkpoints: Trading Liberty For Security

There was a letter published in a local Monterey County California Newspaper where a simple-minded (liberal) writer suggested using “gun checkpoints” to solve the problem of gang violence in Salinas.

I’m always amazed at how anti-gun cowards want to rely on someone else to protect them, and thus allow the protector to put themselves at risk because of the anti-gunner’s cowardice.

Salinas California is a city with a population of about 148,350 people with a murder rate of 4.7 per 100,000 people. Compared to Richmond (population 103,470, with 38 murders per 100,000 people), it’s practically Mayberry, but for Monterey County, it’s a dangerous city.

Never mind the fact that guns aren’t the problem in any high crime area (criminals, are) there is another slight problem with the airhead’s idea of gun checkpoints, namely, the Fourth Amendment. For those who don’t remember that’s the one against unreasonable searches and seizure.

Perhaps the writer thinks only gang members should be stopped. But of course, that would involve “profiling” and liberals hate that.

As Benjamin Franklin wrote, “Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.”

A better use for “gun checkpoints” would be to ensure people entering a high crime area of Salinas (or especially Richmond) were carrying a gun.

Robot

831-869-9932

Another Second Amendment Victory

Today, by a unanimous 3-0 decision, the Washington D.C. Court of Appeals upheld the ruling of a lower court dismissing a lawsuit filed by the District of Columbia and nine families of gun crime victims against 25 gun manufacturers.

The court ruled that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (and common sense), signed into law by President Bush (So he is good for something) required that the lawsuit be dismissed.

One would hope (at least I do) that the news over these past two days would have members of the Brady Center, Handgun Control (confiscation) Inc. etc. jumping out of windows.

Given the good Second Amendment news yesterday and today, one wonders if we'll get a third victory tomorrow.

Perhaps Michael Moore and or Rosie O'Donnell will choke to death on a Big Mac

A Rare Win for the Second Amendment

Today I received somewhat of a birthday present. While I don’t live in the West Coast’s Sin City (San Francisco), I was born there. (Before all of the hippies, sodomites and other various freaks moved there) The California State Court of Appeals struck down a law in the City of Sodomy that would have banned the sale and ownership of handguns and all ammunition.

The NRA successfully sought an injunction against the law’s enforcement in 2005. But regardless, the Sodomite City’s Board of Supervisors lead by Mayor Gavin (Gruesome) Newsom approved penalties consisting of a $1000 fine or 90 days to six months in jail.

This is a big win for the Second Amendment. But, as one person posted to the Ca-Firearms Yahoo group,“Socialists NEVER give up trying to control every aspect of life in the proletariat.” and that Gruesome Newsom and crowd can still appeal the ruling to the California State Supreme Court.

For now, I just accept this birthday present and the rare win against the anti-gun cowards.

Robot

831-869-9932

Bush; The Best President Mexico Ever Had

Once again, Bush has refused to pardon or to even commute the sentences of Border patrol Agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean, even though prosecutor Johnny Sutton, the assistant U.S. Attorney in the case admitted Drug dealer Osvaldo Aldrete-Davila lied under oath when he testified.

Agents Compean and Ramos were convicted and sent to prison for shooting Aldrete-Davila after he turned and pointed what appeared to be a gun at them as he fled back across the border into Mexico. Aldrete-Davila was only slightly injured and the two agents didn’t know they hit the smuggler.

A Federal Appeals Court judge, E. Grady Jolly remarked that it seemed the government overreacted in the prosecution of the two agents.

“Overreacted” may be an understatement. Government prosecutors went to Mexico and offered the smuggler immunity from prosecution in exchange for testifying against the two agents. Prosecutors also withheld from the jury that Aldrete-Davila was arrested several months later for, of course drug smuggling.

One would think that would be enough for Bush to give Compean and Ramos a full pardon, but no. Bush Is Mexico’s punk and quite possibly the best president Mexico has ever had.

Since Bush has been in office he’s pardoned nearly a hundred people, more than a few of them had been convicted of drug dealing and manufacturing. Several of these dealers weren’t just into marijuana and hashish, several dealt in cocaine.

Unfortunately, we will probably get no relief after this next election. Obviously if one of the Marxists, posing as a Democrat wins they’ll do all they can to suck up to Mexico and will probably do everything in their power to allow illegal aliens to vote.

Several of the alleged front runners of the Republican Party, namely Giuliani, McCain and Huckabee won’t do much about illegal aliens either.

Once again, we’re screwed.

Robot

831-869-9932

The Monterey Reds, Still Supporting Our Enemy

Last weekend, the local Monterey bay area Reds held a “vigil” to protest the so-called U.S. torture of Muslim terrorists. The secondary point of the vigil was to protest Ft. Benning’s School of the Americas.

One of the main sponsors for this vigil was the “Peace” Coalition of the Monterey County. The “Peace” Coalition is an umbrella group consisting of several leftist and anti-American organizations. Generally, any organization with “peace” in their title can be counted on to support the usual Communists and their causes.

For those who don’t know, the School of the Americas (which the reds slander by calling the School of “assassins) is a school that teaches our Central and South American allies to fight Communist, and I assume drug-running guerillas operating inside their countries.

Of course American Reds hate it when the U.S. trains people to fight their allies. One would be hard-pressed to find any enemy of the U.S. whom these reds won’t support. These people are of the same ilk, and probably in most cases the very same people who opposed the U.S. in Vietnam and supported Central and South American Communist terrorists during the 80’s. Now, they support Our Muslim extremist enemy.

Several of the speakers for this vigil should tell a lot about their true leanings. One speaker is Macgregor Eddy of the Salinas Action league. The league is another close associate of the “Peace” Coalition. In the weeks prior to the second war with Iraq, Eddy was calling on like-minded Reds to trespass onto the Vandenberg Air Force Base (VAFB) when the attack began in an attempt to disrupt operations there.

Another speaker was Bill Monning, a member of the National lawyers Guild (NLG). While you’ll rarely hear it these days, the NLG was listed by a Congressional committee as “The foremost legal bulwark of the Communist Party”.

The Peace Coalition, Salinas Action League, Eddy, Monning and their ilk can always to be counted on to support our enemies.

I only wish they were as concerned about the torture of our soldiers and other victims of Muslim terrorism.

Robot

831-869-9932

www.InsideTheCompound.com

The Left And Their Relentless Attack On Free Speech

“You can do it your own way, if it's done just how I say”-Metallica

Last year I had a post about liberals and their opposition to freedom of speech. The left only supports freedom of speech when it’s treasonous, seditious, blasphemous (against Christians anyway) and or obscene.

At that time I was mainly speaking of the vandalism done to my vehicle and about a Marxist (Who ran a pirate radio station called “Freedom of Speech’ ironically) who told me I should remove bumper stickers from my car because he didn’t agree with them.

Now most leftists would say those were isolated incidents and that the left really does support freedom of speech.

Several incidents over the past year or so have proven that to be a lie. There is the example of KSCO 1080 AM out of Santa Cruz. The left wanted a boycott of the station because of it having Rush Limbaugh on their station and a bit more recently, a Marxist/Trekkie geek blogger attempted to have several hosts on KSFO 560AM fired. When that failed he and his collaborators tried to scare advertisers away from using the station. As is typical of the left, they accused several of the station’s commentators of using “hate” speech. By definition, “hate” speech is anything said or written that a liberal puke would disagree with.

Two of the most recent offensives by the left against free speech are the attacks on radio host Michael Savage and columnist Ann Coulter.

On Tuesday, August 14^th Gerardo Sandoval of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, introduced a resolution to condemn Michael savage for, you guesses it “Hate” speech. When speaking about of left-wing students who were doing a hunger strike in support of illegal aliens, Savage said they should fast until they starve to death, which by the way seems like a decent plan to me.

Sandoval claimed the remarks were “symbolic of hatred and racism”. The left always attempts to slander people opposed to illegal immigration as being opposed to legal immigration and of hating Hispanics.

The resolution needed a unanimous vote but failed because supervisor Ed Jew voted against the resolution. Not surprisingly, Sandoval attempted to play the race card and claimed Jew would have supported the resolution had Savage made the comments against Asian-Americans. (Jew is a Chinese-American)

The next example yet to happen but is now in then planning stages. The Marxist/Atheist group the People for the “American” Way, a group opposed to the freedom of speech and religion (Christianity anyway) are plotting a protest against Ann Coulter at her upcoming talk at the Xavier University in Cincinnati. The protest will be joined by the usual collection of Reds, Xavier’s Gay-Straight Alliance, Amnesty International, and Habitat for Humanity etc.

Perhaps the Ohio National Guard can make an appearance and hopefully their aim has improved since 1970.

The endgame of the lefts attacks on non-liberal speech is to bring back the “Fairness” Doctrine and other laws that will limit the free speck of non-liberals. The “fairness” Doctrine will require “equal” time for opposing views. With most of the successful shows being somewhat Right of center, non-liberal radio will be adversely affected. Why? I for one, for the most part do not care to hear what some left-wing puke feels. (I say feel because few leftists actually think about issues. To paraphrase Ann Coulter, if liberals would actually think, they’d be Conservatives.)

The “Fairness” Doctrine has been defeated for the time being, but the left has other ideas in mind. One, reported by WorldNetDaily would require broadcasters to show they are operating in the “public interest”.

Does anyone want a bunch of liberal pukes deciding what the “public interest” is?

Brian

831-869-9932

Bush Lied, Illegals Ride (at taxpayer expense)

It’s bad enough that Bush is calling for amnesty to be given to illegal aliens under S.1348, the miss-named “Secure” Borders, Economic Opportunity and Immigration reform Act of 2007, he insults our intelligence by claiming the bill doesn’t call for amnesty. That’s a flat out lie. Basically, Bush is peeing on our backs and telling us it’s raining.

Some of the amnesties this bill include (as reported in TheNewAmerican.com, the webpage of the John Birch Society) are:

Z-Visa AMNESTY, for illegal aliens who CLAIM to have been in the U.S. prior to 1 January 2007.

Agricultural AMNESTY, for illegal aliens in the Country as farm workers

Dream Act AMNESTY, for illegal aliens who’ve snuck into the Country and have graduated from an American high school

Employer AMNESTY, for businesses that knowingly employ illegal aliens

If one wants to give Bush the benefit of the doubt, you could either say he’s an idiot and/or totally out of touch with much of the Republican base. I didn’t see his speech about the issue, but I assume he spoke with a straight face when he claimed people opposed to the AMNESTY bill didn’t want what was right for America.

Bush seems to be accomplishing what the left has been trying to do for years. That is destroying the Republican Party. (Come on libs, you can tell me. Bush is really one of you isn’t he?) This bill isn’t “right for America” and it definitely isn’t right for the Republican Party. The Republican National Committee has laid off all 65 of their phone solicitors. While the RNC claim it’s because they’re updating their phone system, several solicitors told WorldNetDaily it was because of a 40% drop in small donor contributions. (Presumably, the RNC is still getting donations from businesses that rely on the cheap labor of illegal aliens and from the checked-pants, country-club Republicans, who’ve never had loyalty to any true Republican principles other than lower taxes.)

One solicitor told the Washington Times donors have been angry about the immigration issue

Note to Bush, when you find yourself on the same side as (Red) Ted Kennedy, whether it’s the No Child Left behind Act or immigration “reform”, you’re on the WRONG SIDE.

For those who forgot, or who weren’t paying attention, Red Ted supported the 1965 immigration bill, claiming it would not the bill would not flood cities with immigrants or cause Americans to lose their jobs. The drunken Marxist also sponsored the 1986 amnesty bill (Under Reagan, who at least had the decency to call it an amnesty bill) claiming the bill would only give amnesty to only 1.3 million or so illegal aliens and that the borders would be secured and there would never be another amnesty bill like it proposed.

Now the clown is calling for the same thing now that we have nearly 13 million illegal aliens in the Country.

Another person who supports the current AMNESTY bill is John McCain, a totally worthless individual who would best serve the Republican Party by switching to the DNC.

One other person of questionable reliability who supports the AMNESTY bill is former Clinton aid and ex-toe-sucker (?) Dick Morris. Morris claims if the Republicans oppose amnesty, the illegal aliens who are allowed to stay in the Country, and the many, many who follow won’t vote for Republicans. Let me understand this, illegal aliens who enter this Country and receive government handouts will vote for the Republican Party who generally support less government handouts (perhaps Morris sees the Republican Party heading into another, more socialist direction in the future) instead of the Democratic Party who rely on providing handouts to keep their base voting for them.

But then again, Morris predicted Hillary Clinton would never run for senate, the DNC would be destroyed in the ’98 mid-term elections (the reds won five House seats and held their Senate seats) and other failed predictions.

If Bush were serious about dealing with illegal aliens, he would secure our borders, cut off handouts to illegal aliens and severely punish employers who hire them.

Instead, if this bill is passed we will have more illegal aliens (and no Dick, they won’t be voting Republican) and more of the crime and government spending associated with them.

Meanwhile, two Border Patrol Agents, Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean sit in prison, for doing their jobs and Bush refuses to pardon them or give them amnesty.

Robot

831-869-9932

President Bush< Please Take Your Balls Out Of Vicente Fox's Pocket

If there was ever a reason to impeach Mexico’s second president George Bush, it isn’t because of the left-wing myth he lied about Iraq having WMD’s it is because of his refusal to protect our border’s from the terror of illegal aliens.

It’s difficult to take Bush’s “war on terror” when he refuses to make any serious attempt to seal our border with Mexico and allows the wrongful prosecution of those who actually try.

Currently, Border Patrol Agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean are in federal prison for shooting a Mexican drug smuggler as he was bringing nearly 800 pounds of marijuana into our Country. Career drug smuggler, Osbaldo Aldrete-Davila fought with agent Compean, knocking him down. Aldrete-Davila ran back toward the border and while he was running, he turned several times and pointed what appeared to be a weapon at the agents. The agents fired at the smuggler, but he escaped back into Mexico. What the agents didn’t know was the thug had been shot in the ass. (Too bad it wasn’t in the head)

Aldrete-Davila is a friend of Border Patrol agent Rene Sanchez, a nationalized Mexican who is suspected of ties to Mexican drug cartels. Sanchez told Aldrete-Davila he should sue the agents for violating his “civil rights”. Rather than investigating why a Border patrol agent has current ties to a Mexican drug runner, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) sent agents to Mexico to find Aldrete-Davila, and give him immunity to testify against the agents. The prosecutor for this case was U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton, a Bush appointee.

The agents were prosecuted for shooting at an unarmed, fleeing subject. The agents say the smuggler was armed, while the smuggler claims he wasn’t. Who does the prosecution believe? The smuggler of course.

Family members of the smuggler were interviewed by a newspaper and they report Aldrete-Davila has been smuggling drugs since he was 14, and that he is always armed when running dope.

While waiting for the trial to testify against the agents, Aldrete-Davila was again arrested for running dope into the U.S. The gang of Sutton freed him and suppressed information about the arrest at the trial to keep from “prejudicing” the jury.

Agents of the DHS LIED about aspects of the case, claiming Compean and Ramos “knew” the drug smuggler was unarmed, destroyed evidence and said they were out to shoot Mexicans. When asked by several congressmen to support their claims, they refused to do so.

Agent Ramos was placed in the general population of the prison where he was brutally assaulted by several Mexican prisoners. One has to ask why a Border Patrol agent or any law-enforcement officer would be placed in a prison’s general population. I tend to suspect (My personal theory) DOJ and DHS officials wanted him to be killed so their handling of the case could be covered up.

U.S. Attorney Sutton has prosecuted another Law-Enforcement officer for doing his job. Texas Sheriff's Deputy Gilmer Hernandez attempted to stop a van full of illegal aliens after its driver ran a stop sign. The driver attempted to run Hernandez over and he shot at the van’s tires. One of the bullet fragments struck an illegal alien in the mouth and broke two of her teeth. WorldNetDaily reports the Texas Rangers were not going to prosecute Hernandez, but they had been removed from the case because the federal government was taking the case over. I strongly believe state and local governments should refuse to allow the federal government to take over cases like these and have the moral courage to refuse federal funds and be willing to take them to court for violating states rights under the Tenth Amendment.

Hernandez was convicted of violating the illegal alien’s “civil rights” and is now in a Del Rio prison awaiting sentencing.

WorldNetDaily has obtained documents showing the Mexican Consulate role in demanding Border Patrol agents Jose Compean, Ignacio Ramos and Texas Deputy Sheriff Gilmore Hernandez be prosecuted for the incidents involving Mexican citizens in this Country illegally.

President Bush has either pardoned or commuted the sentences of 8 drug dealers. He should pardon these three law-enforcement officers who are in prison for doing their jobs.

Robot
831-869-9932
www.InsideTheCompound.com

Information for this post obtained from www.TheNewAmerican.com and www.WorldNetDaily.com

No Sodomites on Parade in Moscow

There is something seriously wrong with this Country when a mayor in a Communist country takes a moral stance that few, if any mayors in this Country would dare to take. But that’s exactly what happened several days ago in Russia. Moscow mayor Yury Luzhkov refuses to allow a Gay "Pride"(as if being a sodomite was anything to be proud of)parade in his city, describing such a parade as nothing less than satanic. The mayor has been pressured to change his stand by several western governments. So far, he's holding firm. Good for him. If only more politicians in this Country would be so firm in upholding moral values.

Robot

831-869-9932

Elton John, Queen of Pop Bashes Christianity

It was reported yesterday that Elton John, the homo pop artist said he would ban religion completely. As the colorful queer whined,

"I think religion has always tried to turn hatred towards gay people," John said in the Observer newspaper's Music Monthly Magazine. "Religion promotes the hatred and spite against gays."

He added, “Organized religion doesn't seem to work. It turns people into really hateful lemmings and it's not really compassionate."

In the case of Judeo-Christianity, and with the exception of the nutcase Reverend Phelps, “hatred” against homos isn’t preached, instead it’s their perverted sexual practices that are condemned.

I didn’t just find out Elton was a backdoor man, I found that out back in the 70’s when he was one of my favorite singers. I really liked Bennie and the Jets, Saturday night’s Alright for Fighting and other of his songs. I also liked his Captain Fantastic and the Brown Dirt Cowboy album. When I found out it was other men, rather than horses he rode, I stopped buying his music for a time. As years passed by however, I began to listen to his music again. After all, he wasn’t the first queer performer and he wouldn’t be the last. (He especially won’t be the last queer British performer)

However his bashing of religion (and I’m sure, like most homos he’s mostly hates Christianity) is going too far for me. Starting today, I won’t listen to the Christian-hating homo’s music.

As I said before, I liked Elton’s Captain Fantastic album. I bought the CD about a year or so ago and on the day I read about his Christian-bashing I had the CD in my vehicle’s CD player.

I won’t be listening to it again. Three shots from my slingshot and several more from my Air Soft MP5 and Crossman Nightstalker air rifle saw to that.

The Day The Country Died

It's over. The animals have won. When I go to bed tonight I'm almost hoping I die in my sleep.

The End

Today's election will most likely be the beginnings to the end of this Country. If the Reds win this election, and it appears they will we will see in the next election more RINOs running as "republicans" and trying to outdo the demoncrats in driving this Country into socialism.

As Black Sabbath said in one of their songs, "If you listen to fools (liberals), the mob rules"

Robot

831-869-9932

We’re Screwed Part II: The Election about Everything, and Nothing

With the election this Tuesday comes the real threat of the Marxists (Demoncrats) coming into power again. While the Republicans may deserve to lose, the Demoncrats definitely DO NOT deserve to win! If those fools win this Country is finished and there is no longer any hope for it. I can’t say I’m too disappointed with Bush, I didn’t expect too much from him to begin with. Warning to Conservatives, never trust a person who calls himself “Conservative” but feels the need to add the qualifier, “compassionate”. “Compassionate Conservative” is him admitting in a deceptive way he’s just another Demoncrat, though slightly less Marxist.

I am however disappointed with the “Republicans” in the House and Senate. They should have had the balls to stand up to Bush, his big-spending and his protracted wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Our job in Afghanistan was finished when the Taliban was removed from power. Likewise in Iraq, our job was done when Saddam was defeated. We’re wasting time, money and American lives by trying to get Muslims to accept democracy.

The war and illegal immigration are the main reasons the Republicans will lose the House and maybe even the Senate this election. Even if they win, there will still be the usual RINOs blocking any real reform.

The national election aside, California will choose as governor an enviro-marxist, anti-gun, pro-queer goofball or an even more pro-queer, anti-gun and bigger enviro-marxist goofball. (I’m only mentioning the Republican and Demoncratic candidates as the other parties have no chance of winning anything larger than a local election) If you believe the polls, it looks like we’ll be stuck with the former. The former, Arnold Schwarzenegger has been endorsed by one of the most pro-marxist local papers in Monterey County, the Monterey County Weekly. As for me, I wrote in Tom McClintock

For Lt Governor, we have the choice of the pro-family, pro-gun Tom McClintock and near-marxist Demoncrat, Garamendi. Again, I chose McClintock. For Secretary of State we have the choice of the RINO Bruce McPherson (pro-queer, pro-abortion and often anti-gun) and some other guys who’s an even worse choice. I however refuse to vote for a liberal Republican in this case, especially one who was part of the liberal faction who took over the Monterey “Republican” Central Committee. I instead wrote in the name of one of my friends, Peter Kaiser. It was the voter guides provided by him that helped me make many of my choices.

For Attorney General, we have the choice Chuck Poochigian and (no joke) ex-governor Moonbeam, Jerry Brown. (The horror, the horror) If Brown wins, and especially if he wins because of his name recognition, it will be proof that California is indeed overly populated by idiots.

In the 17th Congressional district we have an interesting situation. On one hand we have Sam Farr(left) who’s an enviro-marxist, anti-gun. Pro-queer world government goofball (he’s the only congressman to display the UN flag outside of his office) and the missing Republican candidate Anthony De Maio and write-in candidate Jeff Taylor. De Maio dropped out of sight since making it onto the ballot and I suspect he may even be a Demoncratic Party plant, set up to run so a real GOP candidate could be found to run to oppose Farr (left). Taylor, on the other hand describes himself as supporting traditional values and says he’s involved with Young Life, which I think is a Christian Youth group. However, my friend Kaiser spoke with him and reports that Taylor supports some gun control and supports bans on semi-auto weapons. Also highly distressing is the RINOs of the Monterey County “Republican” Central Committee support him. For those outside of this area, the MCRCC HATES Republicans with traditional values and actively works to keep them off of the Central Committee.

For the 27th State assembly district, we have the choice of a “big-tent”, pro-queer (Endorsed by the Log Cabin (queer) republicans) Michael Morrison and practicing queer and anti-gun Jim Laird. While Morrison is pro-gun, I refuse to vote for a “Republican” endorsed by the queer lobby.

There are also several bond issues on the ballot which I voted no on, and an initiative to protect private property rights from Imminent Domain confiscations, which I voted for. (Liberals hate private property, other people’s private property anyway)

Either way, California is as screwed as the rest of the Country.

God help us.

Robot

831-869-9932

We're Screwed.

As I've said before, liberals are a bigger threat to this Country than Al Qaeda.

When you hear or read about some worthless, atheist liberal puke (this post is mainly just me letting off steam in response to a letter printed in a local paper, written by one such puke)screeching about the "Far Right", "Fundamentalist Christians”,” Christian fascists" or "zealots", etc translate that into what the left-wing savages really mean. What they're really saying is, "We're amoral degenerates and hate the fact that people with even the most basic moral values make us face how perverted we really are and, in order for us to feel good about ourselves, we MUST do away with the basic moral standards this Country held up until about 40 years ago".

40 years ago, would anyone outside of a few outspoken degenerates seriously be suggesting queers should be able to marry, or that abortion should be used as a form of birth control? For people under the age of 30, let me answer, NO! 40 years ago, would people opposed to the above be bashed as intolerant extremists and even compared to the Muslim fanatics with whom we are now at war? No. (Don’t bore me with the e-mails sniveling that all Muslims aren’t terrorists. I know that already)

I’m amazed at how far this Country has fallen just in my lifetime. Thanks in large part to the amoral left in both major political parties, this Country is on Its way down the toilet and It’s barely clinging to the rim.

As bad as it is now, (and Bush isn’t helping matters) it will be much worse if the Party of Degenerates and Traitors, (the DNC) win next Tuesday’s election. It looks like they may have an excellent chance.

Should they win, can anyone suggest a country I can escape to in a hot air balloon or something?
Robot
831-869-9932

Boycott Wal-Mart: Oppose the Degenerate's Agenda

Several months ago, I posted an article in defense of Wal-Mart. The left at that time, while they hate private business in general, had a near slobbering and maniacal hatred of Wal-Mart.

Well now Wal-Mart, perhaps in an attempt to suck up (so to speak) to the left are now embracing the homo-lobby and supporting queer “marriage”. Also, Wal-Mart has joined the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce. Wal-Mart also sells multiple pro-queer books.

The degenerates are on the march. People who hold to even the most basic traditional moral values should be on the march too.

Boycott Wal-Mart.

Robot

831-869-9932

Time for the U.S. to GET OUT of the United Nations

24 October is the anniversary of the United Nation. UN propagandists claim that the UN was “founded to uphold international law and prevent pre-emptive aggression.” The purpose of the UN was to be a socialist, world government. Several of the key U.S. officials who planned the UN were later exposed as Communist agents to include Alger Hiss and Harry Dexter White.

The UN picks and chooses when it wants to “prevent pre-emptive aggression.” In 1961 when Katanga succeeded from the Congo, which at the time was run by the Soviet puppet Patrice Lamumba, UN forces bombed schools, hospitals and private homes to bring Katanga back under the control of the Communist Congolese government. By comparison, in the 50’s during the unprovoked Soviet attack on Hungary, and when Red Chinese were murdering Tibetans during the 60’s or when the Soviets were murdering civilians in Afghanistan during the 70’s and 80’s, the UN did nothing. Today in the Sudan where the Muslims government is fighting a war of rape, genocide and slavery on the country’s Christian population, the UN is doing nothing.

It also should be remembered that Bush Sr. was following the mandates of the UN and advice from Colin Powell when he refused to allow Saddam to be finished off for good.
I could also get into the amount of waste and corruption at the UN or about how the only people who benefit from UN “peacekeeping” is the child sex trade, but I think by now you get the idea.

There has never been a better time for the U.S. to get out of the UN.

Robot

831-869-9932

The Old Monterey Traitors Are Still At It

The Monterey Reds are still at it, and now with an even greater hatred of Jews. Believe it or not, the Reds think Israel should just roll over, let the Islamic destroy them and die. Fortunately for Israel, they don’t confer with American reds and ask for their permission before they decide to defend themselves


Here are a few photos of two of the old reds at the Window-By-The-Bay Park in Monterey. Note how they accuse Bush of being a “Nazi”. If Bush were a real Nazi, they wouldn’t be allowed to conduct such treasonous protests. If they want to see real examples of Nazism, they should take a visit to a country controlled by the Islamic extremists they support.





robot@mbay.net
831-869-9932

XXX: State of the Union: The Movie, the Propaganda

I finally saw XXX: The State of the Union. The plot of the movie was XXX (Ice Cube) attempting to thwart a coup d’etat of a liberal president and cabinet. The point of this writing isn’t to complain about the movie’s lack of realism, i.e., a group of thieves and gang-bangers fighting and beating a group of highly trained, however treasonous (depending on your view on the true state of the union) soldiers. What irritated me was the leftist propaganda in the film.

Now I’ve long since accepted that movies, theatre, television and cable often have a left-wing bent to them. The left-wing slant in XXX was a bit more than I usually tolerate. If I hadn’t had one of my friends over, I wouldn’t have continued watching it.

The first piece of propaganda was when Ice Cube (XXX) was speaking to a senator’s aide and an NRA lobbyist approached table to speak with the aide. Cube told the lobbyist he was a Baptist minister and the lobbyist asked how the NRA could get more support among blacks. Cube told him they, (the NRA) could stop burning crosses and shooting black people. Normally, that would have been the point where I would have turned off the movie and perhaps watched Swordfish or Blackhawk Down again.

I’m under 50 years old so perhaps there was a time prior to that when the NRA “burned crosses” and “shot black people”. However, I’m pretty sure Cube was only spouting off a load of crap. The last time I checked most black people were being shot by other black people, not the NRA or for that matter, not the police. Perhaps Senator Byrd can tell Ice Cube, how many of his allegedly “former” KKK associates teamed up with the NRA and terrorized Negroes.

The other heavy-handed piece of leftist propaganda was the movie president’s speech, which blended in bits of Comrade-presidents Clinton and Carter and the worst of a President Bush. The “president” called for the U.S. to decrease defense spending and give more to international aid and of wining the “hearts and minds” of our enemies and making them our “friends”. OK, will someone remind me why anyone wouldn’t want this clown overthrown? If I didn’t already know the outcome of the film, I would have rooted for William Defoe (The “bad” guy) and his crew.

Now I am reasonably sure the main goal of the film’s writers was entertainment and not to propagandize the viewers. The writers may have just thought the views presented were the opinions many of the audience already held.

That’s scary, very, very scary.

Robot
robot@InsideTheCompound.com
831-869-9932

Pastors for Castro

Yesterday I attended a showing of a pro-Cuba propaganda film put out by the Pastors for Peace. The presentation was sponsored by the Monterey area Peace and Justice Center and Women’s International League for Peace and freedom.

First, a note about groups with the word “peace” in their title, at the very least such groups (with the possible exception of the Peace Corps) will have a socialist bent to their ideology and most of them will be flat-out communist. Such groups will always be opposed to the best interests of the United States and will most always embrace our enemies.

This presentation was promoting the 17th “Friendship Caravan” to Cuba. Travel to Cuba is illegal and this group travels there to send humanitarian aid in an act of civil disobedience. (and treason)

First off, I’ve always wondered why we have an embargo against Cuba and at the same time, embrace Red China and the Soviet Union. It was the U. S. State Department, with the help of media Reds like Herbert Matthews of the New York Times, who helped to put Castro in power. If it weren’t for the Communists in this Country opposing the embargo, I wouldn’t care much about an embargo against Cuba.

One of the people in the film said the U.S. embargo took more of an effect on Cuba after the Soviet Union “fell”. Considering we were trading with the Soviets during the height of the Cold War, in effect, we were also supplying Cuba.

One of the narrators blamed the continuing embargo on the Miami’s Cuban exile community, claiming they were the rich who were most hurt by Castro’s rise to power. The narrator mentioned there are no millionaires in Cuba and they “were not allowed”. I hope to never live in a country where millionaires are “not allowed”.

“Nancy” the person who led the discussion following the film said lately, there’s a problem with pilfering in Cuba and of people not putting out all they can when they work. (this is often a problem with government workers and government programs) She said there’s ongoing discussion in Cuba about how to return to basic socialist “values”, that of “each according to their ability to each according to their needs”. (in other words, how to convince people to put out for people who won’t produce for themselves)

Nancy said many people who want to join the Pastors for Peace asked if they had to be a pastor. She said one doesn’t have to be a pastor or even religious, adding many members of the group were agnostics or atheists. (Big surprise there, most Communists are agnostic or atheist) She mentioned many of the religious people involved were Unitarians. (in other words, agnostics or atheists)

My favorite part about presentations is the question, answer and comment time. One of the first people to comment was a person with an Australian (or New Zealand) accent who spoke of the poverty in Cuba and how women giving birth had to have a friend stand near their bed so that their property wasn’t stolen. He also mentioned the lack of worth ethics due to the communist system.
As expected, Nancy claimed the poverty was due to the embargo.

Another person spoke of the lack of freedom in Cuba and how people aren’t allowed to leave Cuba and have to sneak out in homemade rafts and boats. Emboldened by the two anti-communist speakers, I asked if anyone was allowed to run against Castro. Nancy told me the politics in Cuba were much different than our, (God willing, our political system will always be different from Cuba’s) she said the voters in Castro’s district could nominate someone other than Castro to run, but they wouldn’t have much of a chance.

Of course, most of the people commenting were the usual Reds. In responding to comments about the oppressive government in Cuba, a person claimed the U.S. has an oppressive government. (not so oppressive, however that is punishes people who speak against the U.S. government, its president and even allows reds to travel to an enemy country and yet allow them back into the Country)

One person said many of the people flee to the U.S. to obtain things they “don’t need”, i.e. computers, I pods, DVD players, etc. Hopefully, this Country will never get to the point when socialists can decide what I “need” or “don’t need”.

I briefly spoke with the second anti-communist I mentioned earlier. He said he was opposed to the embargo because it gave Cuba an excuse for failing. He added it should be allowed to collapse like the Soviet Union without an embargo to blame it on.

Later that night, I had the Spanish channel on at home. They showed a demonstration against Castro. (I assume in the U.S. some of the signs were in English and Castro doesn’t allow opposition in Cuba) One of the signs said Cuba is one of the countries with the highest numbers of imprisoned journalists.

Frankly, I think when these people break the embargo and travel to Cuba, they shouldn’t be allowed back into this Country.

Maybe Castro will take them in. Then they would get the opportunity to see how the